Brent McGillis: What is wrong with Alberta's Appeal Court and WHY Patrick Clayton has no chance

Thursday, January 9, 2014

What is wrong with Alberta's Appeal Court and WHY Patrick Clayton has no chance

There are a number of serious breaches of Law when it comes to the case of when we witnessed Edmonton City Police Staff Sergeant Bill Clark and his son appear before an Alberta Appeals Court Judge. The first and most aggregious violation of the trust that is empowered to an Appeals Court Justice is the implicit concept of impartiality. The base principle of impartiality that Justice Systems are based on is not some abstract idea, this is a very real and concrete Legal Quantum that all Justices serving on the bench have to abide by. When this is not applied equally to all citizens of a district, republic or territory then the Social Contract has been broken. When the court system is severely skewed in order to serve the connected and the wealthy, the Social Contract no longer exists. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_contract
In Contemporary Jurisprudence this hearing violates the very essence and principles of Natural Law in "That the meaning of law is such that its content cannot be determined except by reference to moral principle." Secondly and also a very serious violation of principles this Judge was sworn to uphold is the fact that he "Aided and Abetted" the prosecutor in concocting a very flimsy excuse for a legitimate Appeal, so that the son of a very prominent Murder Detective in the Edmonton Police Service could get a second trial date, when any Joe Albertan straight off of the street would be promptly denied such luxuries.
These are very disturbing revelations of how things REALLY work inside of the Alberta Court of Appeal. As such Patrick Clayton has NO Chance of the Alberta Court of Appeals paying even a passing fancy at the statements Patrick is making in the court room. Thirdly and also a very serious violation of the rules of court, are that a prosecutor working for the Appeals Court and the Government of Alberta Justice Department would be part and party to this obvious obfuscation of the application of the Laws of Alberta. This is disturbing that the prosecutor and the Judge did not recuse themselves from illegally creating a false defense for any citizen, let alone for a famous Murder Detective who obviously wields great influence in this community.
  Regular Alberta Joes are not pampered within the halls of Justice in Edmonton, like the Detective and his son. I was shocked and very disturbed to witness how flip and openly casual the Crown Prosecutor was, and equally as shocked at the openly gleeful manner in which the Judge twisted the Law for an Edmonton City Police officer, when he does NOT offer the very same services for the rest of the members of this community.
  At the end of this very bizarre legal event, the Judge gave some advice to the detective, he said and I quote; "Next time bring a lawyer to court".
 Why bother bringing a Lawyer when you have the Judge AND the Crown prosecutor both working to devise an extremely illegal bogus DEFENSE for Edmonton City Cops, FOR FREE?
How can you possibly create a better bogus defense than that? Impossible really, and it really did happen right here in a Alberta Court of Appeal last year. I was there, as was a lawyer and my friend.
  Doug Horner was not kidding when he said he would "Fix things for Alison Redford". This how the Judiciary REALLY works in Hellberta, where the elite are pampered even within our super corrupt Justice System. Denis is no different that Redford is my official opinion when it comes to hacking the Judicial rules for the priveleged in Hellberta. Just another crony is what I see through my eyes.

No comments:

Post a Comment